Identifying treatment effects on categorical outcomes in IV models

Onil Boussim

Papers from arXiv.org

Abstract: This paper provides a nonparametric framework for causal inference with categorical outcomes under binary treatment and binary instrument settings. I decompose the observed joint probability of outcomes and treatment into marginal probabilities of potential outcomes and treatment, and association parameters that capture selection bias due to unobserved heterogeneity. Under a novel identifying assumption \emph{association similarity}, which requires the dependence between unobserved factors driving treatment and potential outcomes to be invariant across treatment states, I achieve point identification of the full distribution of potential outcomes. Recognizing that this assumption may be strong in some contexts, I propose two weaker alternatives: monotonic association, which restricts the direction of selection heterogeneity, and bounded association, which constrains its magnitude. These relaxed assumptions deliver sharp partial identification bounds that nest point identification as a special case and facilitate transparent sensitivity analysis. I illustrate the framework in an empirical application, estimating the causal effect of private health insurance on health outcomes.

Date: 2025-10, Revised 2025-11
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-ecm
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://arxiv.org/pdf/2510.10946 Latest version (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:arx:papers:2510.10946

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Papers from arXiv.org
Bibliographic data for series maintained by arXiv administrators ().