Does Local Urban Governance Status Matter? Evidence from India

Saannidhya Rawat

Papers from arXiv.org

Abstract: We exploit quasi-random variation around the multi-threshold criteria used to classify Census Towns (CTs) and focus on settlements near the thresholds that are likely to obtain statutory recognition. Using a local fuzzy regression discontinuity design and a multi-threshold criteria, we show that meeting the CT eligibility in 2001 raises the probability of statutory recognition by 2011. Instrumenting statutory recognition with CT eligibility, we estimate the effects of ULB status on local public goods provision: government schools increase by 13.86 (primary), 7.72 (middle), and 4.89 (secondary) units, healthcare infrastructure expands by 2.53 hospitals and 3.00 family welfare centers, and financial access deepens with 4.09 cooperative banks and 2.84 agricultural credit societies. Community amenities also improve, while sports infrastructure declines by 5.71 facilities, consistent with reallocation of urban land. The corresponding reduced-form estimates are directionally consistent and indicate that crossing the CT eligibility frontier improves public goods provision. Our findings indicate that timely municipalization of emerging urban areas can expand provision of public goods.

Date: 2025-11, Revised 2026-03
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-dev, nep-sea and nep-ure
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://arxiv.org/pdf/2511.06562 Latest version (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:arx:papers:2511.06562

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Papers from arXiv.org
Bibliographic data for series maintained by arXiv administrators ().