Survivorship Bias in Emerging Market Small-Cap Indices: Evidence from India's NIFTY Smallcap 250

Harjot Singh Ranse

Papers from arXiv.org

Abstract: This study quantifies survivorship bias in India's NIFTY Smallcap 250 index using a dataset of 1,437 stocks over nine years (2016-2025). By reconstructing historical index composition through market capitalization ranking and comparing equal-weight portfolios of current constituents versus all historical members, I show that survivor-only backtesting overstates annual returns by 4.94 percentage points (23.3%) and Sharpe ratios by 0.097 (9.1%). The analysis reveals an 82.5% turnover rate, including delisted (16.1%), graduated (33.1%), and demoted stocks (33.2%), with all categories contributing to bias. Using bhavcopy data that includes delisted securities, the reconstruction achieves 100% accuracy for current constituents and an estimated 85-90% accuracy historically. These findings highlight that survivorship bias is materially larger in emerging market small-caps and that using only current index members can significantly overstate strategy performance. Briefly, the methodology reconstructs historical index membership using a price-volume-based ranking approach to enable survivor-free backtesting.

Date: 2026-03
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://arxiv.org/pdf/2603.19380 Latest version (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:arx:papers:2603.19380

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Papers from arXiv.org
Bibliographic data for series maintained by arXiv administrators ().