You've Got to be Efficient: Ambiguity, Misspecification and Variational Preferences

Karun Adusumilli

Papers from arXiv.org

Abstract: We develop a framework for evaluating statistical decisions under both prior ambiguity and likelihood misspecification, which involves uniformly expanding a frequentist ambiguity set by a Kullback-Leibler radius. Optimal decisions are equivalent to minimax decisions under an exponentially tilted loss: misspecification tilts the loss, while ambiguity selects the least favorable prior. This separation permits local asymptotic analysis under general misspecification, allowing for both local and global priors. For estimation and treatment-assignment, optimal decisions coincide with those under correct specification for any degree of misspecification, including in semiparametric models. This favors maximum-likelihood over simulated method of moments, and efficient GMM over diagonally weighted alternatives.

Date: 2026-04, Revised 2026-10
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-ecm and nep-mic
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://arxiv.org/pdf/2604.05327 Latest version (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:arx:papers:2604.05327

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Papers from arXiv.org
Bibliographic data for series maintained by arXiv administrators ().