Who Saw It Coming? Historical Experience and the 2021 Inflation Forecast Failure

Dalibor Stevanovic

Papers from arXiv.org

Abstract: This paper studies the 2021 U.S. inflation forecasting failure. I show that the failure was primarily driven by sample composition rather than functional-form misspecification: estimation samples dominated by the Great Moderation underweight supply-shock regimes, and expectations anchored to that regime were slow to recognize the shift. Three historically informed adjustments, an intercept correction, a similarity re-estimation on 1970s data, and a kernel-weighted estimator, substantially close the forecast gap, and the gains extend to eight additional U.S. price indices. Household survey respondents over 60, whose lifetime includes the 1970s, reported higher inflation expectations from early 2021, consistent with experience-based learning; younger cohorts remained anchored to the prevailing regime. A controlled experiment with large language models conditioned on ``experienced'' and ``young'' professional personas confirms that experiential priors generate significant forecast differences under a common training leakage assumption. Across all three exercises, the source of the prior mattered more than the sophistication of the model.

Date: 2026-04
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-for and nep-mon
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://arxiv.org/pdf/2604.14467 Latest version (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:arx:papers:2604.14467

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Papers from arXiv.org
Bibliographic data for series maintained by arXiv administrators ().