Causal Identification under Interference: The Role of Treatment Assignment Independence

Julius Owusu and Monika Avila M\'arquez

Papers from arXiv.org

Abstract: Empirical researchers routinely invoke the no-interference or \textit{individualistic treatment response} (ITR) assumption to identify causal effects in observational studies, despite concerns that interference across units may arise in many economic settings. This paper studies the causal content of standard ITR-based identification formulas when arbitrary interference is present. We show that, under restrictions on dependence between treatment assignments across units, conventional ITR-based identification formulas -- including those underlying selection-on-observables, instrumental variables, regression discontinuity designs, and difference-in-differences -- identify well-defined causal objects: types of \textit{average direct effects} (ADEs). These results do not require knowledge of the interference structure or specification of exposure mappings. We also propose a sensitivity analysis framework that quantifies the robustness of statistical inference to violations of treatment-assignment independence under arbitrary interference.

Date: 2026-04
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://arxiv.org/pdf/2604.22532 Latest version (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:arx:papers:2604.22532

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Papers from arXiv.org
Bibliographic data for series maintained by arXiv administrators ().