Chaining Tasks, Redefining Work: A Theory of AI Automation

Mert Demirer, John J. Horton, Nicole Immorlica, Brendan Lucier and Peyman Shahidi

Papers from arXiv.org

Abstract: We study the automation and productivity effects of AI when production is a sequence of interdependent steps with a Leontief structure. Each step can be executed manually by labor, augmented with AI, or automated within contiguous AI-executed steps called "chains." By characterizing the firm's cost-minimizing assignment of steps to humans and AI, we show that chaining can overturn comparative advantage logic, since human-advantaged steps may be optimally assigned to AI as part of a chain. Chaining also makes gains from automation depend on how AI-exposed steps cluster in the workflow beyond just how many there are, and can make the returns to improving AI quality non-monotone in a pattern resembling the productivity J-curve. Empirically, we show that existing automation patterns are consistent with the model's predictions: a step is more likely to be AI-executed when its neighbors are, and AI execution is more common where AI-exposed steps cluster in the workflow.

Date: 2026-06, Revised 2026-10
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-ain
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
https://arxiv.org/pdf/2606.15960 Latest version (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:arx:papers:2606.15960

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Papers from arXiv.org
Bibliographic data for series maintained by arXiv administrators ().