Information Comparison of Order Statistics, with Applications to Auctions and Voting

Alfredo Di Tillio, Marco Ottaviani and Peter N. S{\o}rensen

Papers from arXiv.org

Abstract: We compare the informativeness of order statistics in a sample of conditionally independent draws from a distribution \(F(x\mid\theta)\) as the sample size n increases. The k-th highest of n+1 draws is more accurate than the k-th highest of n if and only if the cumulative reverse hazard -\log F(x\mid\theta) is log-supermodular. Symmetrically, the k-th lowest is more accurate if and only if the cumulative hazard -\log(1-F(x\mid\theta)) is log-supermodular. Reversals are exceptional, occurring only for experiments that are, up to increasing transformations, exponential location experiments. In large samples, middle order statistics are asymptotically fully informative, while bounded lower and upper ranks require unbounded informativeness tail conditions. When full learning fails, bounded ranks converge to location experiments, and more central ranks are Blackwell more informative. Extending the analysis from scalar order statistics to blocks of selected data, we obtain multidimensional comparisons under log-supermodularity of hazard rates. The results unify and extend information-aggregation results in auctions and provide a new order-statistic approach to strategic voting.

Date: 2026-07
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-des
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://arxiv.org/pdf/2607.10435 Latest version (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:arx:papers:2607.10435

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Papers from arXiv.org
Bibliographic data for series maintained by arXiv administrators ().