Position: AI Leaderboards Are Underserving the Global South: A Case Study from India

Sourav Banerjee and Saikat Saha

Papers from arXiv.org

Abstract: This position paper argues that AI leaderboards are structurally ill-suited to serving the Global South because they lack independent governance, conflict-of-interest policies, and mechanisms for metric evolution. The barrier is not missing data; high-quality regional benchmarks already exist: IndicSUPERB, MILU, and LAHAJA for India; IrokoBench for Africa; AlGhafa for Arabic. The barrier is institutional design. Global leaderboards do not include these benchmarks, and no governance mechanism compels them to do so. Commercial pressure corrects leaderboard failures when paying customers in the Global North are affected. The Global South lacks equivalent leverage. Without governance, failures affecting Hindi, Swahili, or Arabic speakers persist indefinitely as documented but unaddressed gaps. Using India as a case study (1.4 billion people, 22 scheduled languages, high-quality benchmarks, but no trusted aggregation), we report findings from a consultation with 58 AI practitioners showing consistent preference for formal governance and disclosure-based conflict management. The solution is not more data but better institutions: regional leaderboards with independent governance from the start.

Date: 2026-07
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Published in https://icml.cc/virtual/2026/poster/67182

Downloads: (external link)
https://arxiv.org/pdf/2608.18117 Latest version (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:arx:papers:2608.18117

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Papers from arXiv.org
Bibliographic data for series maintained by arXiv administrators ().