Does Rank Still Matter? Position Bias When AI Agents Shop on Our Behalf

Davood Wadi and Yu Ma

Papers from arXiv.org

Abstract: When shopping is delegated to AI agents, it is unclear whether the ranking advantage documented for humans persists. Across 7,000 sessions with five large language models (LLMs) and varying reasoning effort, we compare AI agents with human field data. AI agents search more extensively than human consumers. As with humans, lower-ranked listings are less likely to be inspected, although the effect is smaller for AI agents. Unlike humans, AI agents show a pattern consistent with the lost-in-the-middle effect, whereby middle listings have the lowest probability of inspection. At the choice stage, position effects are concentrated at lower reasoning effort, but higher effort reduces the middle penalty for every LLM that exhibits it. These findings suggest that, when search is delegated, displayed attributes may matter more than placement, and that exposure to position bias depends on how the AI agent is configured.

Date: 2026-08, Revised 2026-10
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-ain and nep-cmp
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://arxiv.org/pdf/2608.22697 Latest version (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:arx:papers:2608.22697

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Papers from arXiv.org
Bibliographic data for series maintained by arXiv administrators ().