Economics at your fingertips  

Advice from Women and Men and Selection into Competition

Jordi Brandts and Cristina Rott

No 1007, Working Papers from Barcelona Graduate School of Economics

Abstract: We study how gender affects the impact of advice on men’s and women’s entry into a real-effort tournament and how advice varies with gender and gender matching. Our results show that advice reduces expected forgone earnings. The result is exclusively due to the positive reaction of women’s behavior, regardless of the advisor’s gender. The gender gap is not reduced. With respect to the advice process, our main findings are that, for medium performers, women are less likely to recommend tournament entry than men, women’s advice is worse, and men enter the tournament significantly more often than women with advice. Men follow the advice to avoid the tournament less often than women, independently of whether it comes from a male or female advisor. Overall, the gender of the paired advisee (advisor) does not impact advice giving (following).

Keywords: experiments; advice; gender gap in competitiveness (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C91 J08 J16 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-gen and nep-lab
Date: 2017-12
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1) Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link) (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link:

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from Barcelona Graduate School of Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Bruno Guallar ().

Page updated 2019-11-16
Handle: RePEc:bge:wpaper:1007