Advice from Women and Men and Selection into Competition
Jordi Brandts and
No 1007, Working Papers from Barcelona Graduate School of Economics
We study how gender affects the impact of advice on men’s and women’s entry into a real-effort tournament and how advice varies with gender and gender matching. Our results show that advice reduces expected forgone earnings. The result is exclusively due to the positive reaction of women’s behavior, regardless of the advisor’s gender. The gender gap is not reduced. With respect to the advice process, our main findings are that, for medium performers, women are less likely to recommend tournament entry than men, women’s advice is worse, and men enter the tournament significantly more often than women with advice. Men follow the advice to avoid the tournament less often than women, independently of whether it comes from a male or female advisor. Overall, the gender of the paired advisee (advisor) does not impact advice giving (following).
Keywords: experiments; advice; gender gap in competitiveness (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C91 J08 J16 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-gen and nep-lab
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bge:wpaper:1007
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Working Papers from Barcelona Graduate School of Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Bruno Guallar ().