Robustness of intermediate agreements for the Discrete Raiffa solution
Walter Trockel ()
No 496, Center for Mathematical Economics Working Papers from Center for Mathematical Economics, Bielefeld University
First via a counter example it is shown that the Proposition 3 of Anbarci & Sun (2013) is false. Then a gap and a mistake in their proof are identified. Finally, a modified version of their Proposition 3 is stated and proved.
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-gth
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (5) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
https://pub.uni-bielefeld.de/download/2700703/2902748 First Version, 2013 (application/x-download)
Journal Article: Robustness of intermediate agreements for the discrete Raiffa solution (2014)
Working Paper: Robustness of intermediate agreements for the Discrete Raiffa solution (2014)
Working Paper: Robustness of Intermediate Agreements for the Discrete Raiffa Solution (2012)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bie:wpaper:496
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Center for Mathematical Economics Working Papers from Center for Mathematical Economics, Bielefeld University Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Bettina Weingarten ().