Robustness of intermediate agreements for the Discrete Raiffa solution

Walter Trockel

No 496, Center for Mathematical Economics Working Papers from Center for Mathematical Economics, Bielefeld University

Abstract: First via a counter example it is shown that the Proposition 3 of Anbarci & Sun (2013) is false. Then a gap and a mistake in their proof are identified. Finally, a modified version of their Proposition 3 is stated and proved.

Pages: 11
Date: 2014-10-24
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-gth
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (8)

Downloads: (external link)
https://pub.uni-bielefeld.de/download/2700703/2902748 First Version, 2013 (application/x-download)

Related works:
Journal Article: Robustness of intermediate agreements for the discrete Raiffa solution (2014)
Working Paper: Robustness of intermediate agreements for the Discrete Raiffa solution (2014)
Working Paper: Robustness of Intermediate Agreements for the Discrete Raiffa Solution (2012)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bie:wpaper:496

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Center for Mathematical Economics Working Papers from Center for Mathematical Economics, Bielefeld University Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Bettina Weingarten ().