Robustness of intermediate agreements for the discrete Raiffa solution

Walter Trockel

Games and Economic Behavior, 2014, vol. 85, issue C, 32-36

Abstract: First via a counter example it is shown that Proposition 3 of Anbarci and Sun (2013) is false. Then a gap and a mistake in their proof are identified. Finally, a modified version of their Proposition 3 is stated and proved.

Keywords: Discrete Raiffa solution; Axiomatic bargaining; Bargaining games (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C71 C78 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2014
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (8)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0899825614000153
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
Working Paper: Robustness of intermediate agreements for the Discrete Raiffa solution (2014)
Working Paper: Robustness of intermediate agreements for the Discrete Raiffa solution (2014)
Working Paper: Robustness of Intermediate Agreements for the Discrete Raiffa Solution (2012)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:gamebe:v:85:y:2014:i:c:p:32-36

DOI: 10.1016/j.geb.2013.12.012

Access Statistics for this article

Games and Economic Behavior is currently edited by E. Kalai

More articles in Games and Economic Behavior from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().