Classification using Random Forests in Stata and R

Linden McBride and Austin Nichols
Additional contact information
Austin Nichols: The Urban Institute

2014 Stata Conference from Stata Users Group

Abstract: Many estimation problems focus on classification of cases (into bins) with tools that aim to identify cases using only a small subset of all possible questions. These tools can be used in diagnoses of disease, identification of advanced or failing students using tests, or classification into poor and nonpoor for the targeting of a means-tested social program. Most popular estimation procedures for generating these tools prioritize minimization of in-sample prediction errors, but the objective in generating such tools is the minimization of out-of-sample prediction errors. We provide a comparison of linear discriminant, discrete choice, and random forest methods, with applications to means-tested social programs. Out-of-sample prediction error is typically minimized by random forest algorithms.

Date: 2014-08-02
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-dcm
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://repec.org/bos2014/boston14_mcbride.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:boc:scon14:10

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in 2014 Stata Conference from Stata Users Group Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Christopher F Baum ().