Fiscal Discriminations in Three Wars

George Hall and Thomas Sargent

No 56, Working Papers from Brandeis University, Department of Economics and International Business School

Abstract: In 1790, a U.S. paper dollar was widely held in disrepute (something shoddy was not ‘worth a Continental’). By 1879, a U.S. paper dollar had become ‘as good as gold.’ These outcomes emerged from how the U.S. federal government financed three wars: the American Revolution, the War of 1812, and the Civil War. In the beginning, the U.S. government discriminated greatly in the returns it paid to different classes of creditors; but that pattern of discrimination diminished over time in ways that eventually rehabilitated the reputation of federal paper money as a store of value.

Keywords: Repudiation; Reputation; Discrimination; Legal tender; Greenbacks; Alexander Hamilton; Albert Gallatin; Ulysses S. Grant (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 40 pages
Date: 2013-05
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-his
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.brandeis.edu/economics/RePEc/brd/doc/Brandeis_WP56.pdf First version, 2013 (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Fiscal discriminations in three wars (2014)
Working Paper: Fiscal Discriminations in Three Wars (2013)
Working Paper: Fiscal Discriminations in Three Wars
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:brd:wpaper:56

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from Brandeis University, Department of Economics and International Business School Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Andrea Luna ().