Order-k Rationality

Salvador Barber‡, Geoffroy de Clippel, Alejandro Neme () and Kareen Rozen

No 2020-10, Working Papers from Brown University, Department of Economics

Abstract: A decision maker (DM) may not perfectly maximize her preference over the feasible set. She may feel it is good enough to maximize her preference over a sufficiently large consideration set; or just require that her choice is sufficiently well-ranked (e.g., in the top quintile of options); or even endogenously determine a threshold for what is good enough, based on an initial sampling of the options. Heuristics such as these are all encompassed by a common theory of Order-k Rationality, which relaxes perfect optimization by only requiring choices from a set S to fall within the set's top k(S) elements according to the DM's preference ordering. Heuristics aside, this departure from rationality offers a natural way, in the classic 'as if' tradition, to gradually accommodate more choice patterns as k increases. We characterize the empirical content of Order-k Rationality (and related theories), and provide a tractable testing method which is comparable to the method of checking SARP.

Date: 2020
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-mic
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://economics.brown.edu/sites/g/files/dprerj72 ... Paper%202020-010.pdf

Related works:
Journal Article: Order-k rationality (2022)
Working Paper: Order-k Rationality (2020)
Working Paper: Order-k Rationality (2019)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bro:econwp:2020-10

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from Brown University, Department of Economics Department of Economics, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Brown Economics Webmaster ().