Social Position and Distributive Justice: Experimental Evidence

Kurtis Swope (), John Cadigan, Pamela Schmitt () and Robert Shupp

No 200505, Working Papers from Ball State University, Department of Economics

Abstract: In a simple double-blind dictator experiment, systematically removing subjects’ levels of power and entitlement increases their choice of an income distribution generally consistent with Rawls (1971) concept of distributive justice, although choices are less unanimous and risk-averse than hypothesized

Keywords: Power; entitlement; justice; experiments (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C91 D31 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 8 pages
Date: 2005-06, Revised 2005-06
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-cbe, nep-exp and nep-soc
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
http://econfac.bsu.edu/research/workingpapers/bsuecwp200505swope.pdf First version, 2005 (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Social Position and Distributive Justice: Experimental Evidence (2008)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bsu:wpaper:200505

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from Ball State University, Department of Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Tung Liu ().