Personality Preferences in Laboratory Economics Experiments
Kurtis Swope (),
John Cadigan (),
Pamela Schmitt () and
Additional contact information
John Cadigan: Department of Public Administration, American University
No 200507, Working Papers from Ball State University, Department of Economics
Student volunteers at the U.S. Naval Academy (USNA) participated in one of the following oneshot games: a dictator game, an ultimatum game, a trust game, or a prisoner’s dilemma game. We find limited support for the importance of personality type for explaining subjects’ decisions. With controls for personality preferences, we find little evidence of behavioral differences between males and females. Furthermore, we conclude that seniority breeds feelings of entitlement - seniors at USNA generally exhibited the least cooperative or other-regarding behavior.
Keywords: Experiments; preferences; personality (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: A12 C72 C78 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 26 pages
Date: 2005-07, Revised 2005-07
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-evo, nep-exp, nep-gth and nep-soc
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
http://econfac.bsu.edu/research/workingpapers/bsuecwp200507swope.pdf First version, 2005 (application/pdf)
Journal Article: Personality preferences in laboratory economics experiments (2008)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bsu:wpaper:200507
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Working Papers from Ball State University, Department of Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Tung Liu ().