Comparing Alternative Predictors Based on Large-Panel Factor Models

Antonello D'Agostino and Domenico Giannone

No 14/RT/06, Research Technical Papers from Central Bank of Ireland

Abstract: This paper compares the predictive ability of the factor models of Stock and Watson (2002) and Forni, Hallin, Lippi, and Reichlin (2005) using a “large” panel of US macroeconomic variables. We propose a nesting procedure of comparison that clarifies and partially overturns the results of similar exercises in the literature. As in Stock and Watson (2002), we find that efficiency improvements due to the weighting of the idiosyncratic components do not lead to significant more accurate forecasts. In contrast to Boivin and Ng (2005), we show that the dynamic restrictions imposed by the procedure of Forni, Hallin, Lippi, and Reichlin (2005) are not harmful for predictability. Our main conclusion is that for the dataset at hand the two methods have a similar performance and produce highly collinear forecasts.

Pages: 41 pages
Date: 2006-12
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (54)

Downloads: (external link)
https://centralbank.ie/docs/default-source/publica ... annone).pdf?sfvrsn=4 (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Comparing Alternative Predictors Based on Large‐Panel Factor Models (2012)
Working Paper: Comparing Alternative Predictors Based on Large-Panel Factor Models (2007)
Working Paper: Comparing alternative predictors based on large-panel factor models (2006)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cbi:wpaper:14/rt/06

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Research Technical Papers from Central Bank of Ireland Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Fiona Farrelly (fiona.farrelly@centralbank.ie).