Measuring Racial Discrimination in Bail Decisions

Will Dobbie, Peter Hull and David Arnold

University of California at San Diego, Economics Working Paper Series from Department of Economics, UC San Diego

Abstract: We develop new quasi-experimental tools to measure disparate impact, regardless of its source, in the context of bail decisions. We show that omitted variables bias in pretrial release rate comparisons can be purged by using the quasi-random assignment of judges to estimate average pretrial misconduct risk by race. We find that two-thirds of the release rate disparity between white and Black defendants in New York City is due to the disparate impact of release decisions. We then develop a hierarchical marginal treatment effect model to study the drivers of disparate impact, finding evidence of both racial bias and statistical discrimination.

Keywords: C26; J15; K42 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022-09-01
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-law and nep-ure
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (13)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/6f22n2h3.pdf;origin=repeccitec (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Measuring Racial Discrimination in Bail Decisions (2022)
Working Paper: Measuring Racial Discrimination in Bail Decisions (2020)
Working Paper: Measuring Racial Discrimination in Bail Decisions (2020)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cdl:ucsdec:qt6f22n2h3

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in University of California at San Diego, Economics Working Paper Series from Department of Economics, UC San Diego Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Lisa Schiff ().