The Disadvantage of Tying Their Hands: On the Political Economy of Policy Commitments

G Milesi-Feretti

CEP Discussion Papers from Centre for Economic Performance, LSE

Abstract: Incumbents are more likely to be re-elected if they have a comparative advantage in the eyes of voters on some central issue. This paper argues that incumbents have an incentive to avoid reforms that reduce the government's role in deciding these issues, in order to increase their chances of re-election. This point is illustrated in the context of the choice of an exchange-rate regime in an economy characterized by an "inflation bias". A flexible exchange rate allows the government to use monetary policy as a stabilization tool, while fixed exchange rates remove the "inflation bias" of the economy. On the one hand, it is shown that a more inflation-averse government may refrain from choosing fixed exchange rates in order to capitalize on the "inflationary" reputation of its opponent. This incentive is contrasted with the opposite incentive to "tie the hands" of the future government should be incumbent be defeated. On the other hand, it is shown that electoral considerations may reinforce the incentive of the more "inflationary" government to "tie its own hands" with fixed exchange rates.

Date: 1993-03
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cep:cepdps:dp0125

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in CEP Discussion Papers from Centre for Economic Performance, LSE
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().