The Labour Market over the Business Cycle: Can Theory Fit the Facts?

Stephen Millard, Andrew Scott and Marianne Sensier ()

CEP Discussion Papers from Centre for Economic Performance, LSE

Abstract: We examine the ability of six labour market models to account for the business cycle behaviour of UK labour markets when embedded in a stochastic growth model. WE assess the models in terms of : (i) their ability to mimic general business cycle correlations and volatility (ii) their success at explaining the persistence of labour market fluctuations and (iii) whether the models can explain why the growth and speed of adjustment of labour market variables changes between periods of expansions and contractions. The main success of the models is the ability to broadly account for business cycle correlations and co-movements and the changes in employment/unemployment growth rates between expansions and contractions. However, there are three main failures (a) the models tend to produce insufficiently volatile employment and unemployment fluctuations (b) the models tend to produce too strong a correlation between wages and employment (c) most of the models generate only brief temporary deviations in unemployment in response to shocks rather than the protracted dynamics of the data.

Date: 1997-09
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (40)

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
Journal Article: The Labour Market over the Business Cycle: Can Theory Fit the Facts? (1997)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cep:cepdps:dp0364

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in CEP Discussion Papers from Centre for Economic Performance, LSE
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().