 Crime and Benefit SanctionsStephen Machin and Olivier Marie CEP Discussion Papers from Centre for Economic Performance, LSE Abstract: In this paper we look at the relationship between crime and economic incentives in a different way to other workin this area. We look at changes in unemployment benefits and the imposition of benefit sanctions as a means ofstudying the way that people on the margins of crime may react to economic incentives. The paper relies on aquasiexperimental setting induced by the introduction of the Jobseekers Allowance (JSA) in the UK in October1996. We look at crime rates in areas more and less affected by the policy change before and after JSAintroduction. In the areas more affected by the tougher benefit regime crime rose by more. These were also theareas with higher outflows from unemployment and particularly to people dropping off the register but not intowork, education/training or onto other benefits. Areas that had more sanctioned individuals also experiencedhigher crime rates after the introduction of JSA. As such the benefit cuts and sanctions embodied in the JSAappear to have induced individuals previously on the margins to engage in crime. Thus there appears to havebeen an unintended policy consequence, associated with the benefit reform, namely higher crime. Keywords: Crime; Benefit Sanctions; Jobseekers allowance (search for similar items in EconPapers) Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cep:cepdps:dp0645 Access Statistics for this paper More papers in CEP Discussion Papers from Centre for Economic Performance, LSE |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.