From Intent to Inertia: Experimental Evidence from the Retail Electricity Market

Christina Gravert

No 11139, CESifo Working Paper Series from CESifo

Abstract: This paper presents new evidence on the question: Why don’t consumers switch electricity contracts? By conducting a large-scale survey experiment with 3% of the Danish working-age population, I have gathered data on respondents’ factual knowledge of the retail electricity market, their beliefs, preferences, and intentions to switch providers. Crucially, I can link their intentions with actual switching behaviors using nationwide smart meter data. My findings reveal a enormous gap between switching intentions and actions. This gap is exacerbated by my experimental interventions which 1) provide information about savings and switching costs and 2) decrease switching costs by offering free access to a switching service. A majority of consumers leaves money on the table by not switching, despite their stated intentions to switch. The low switching rates of on average 1.2% per month cannot be explained by biased beliefs or high switching costs. Demographics do not explain switching behavior, but personality traits such as risk aversion, trust, and a tendency to avoid procrastination matter. These results raise the fundamental question: Why should consumers actively choose electricity contracts? Instead, policymakers should consider implementing smart defaults, for which I find strong support from consumers.

Keywords: consumer inertia; electricity markets; switching; field experiment (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C83 D03 D12 D83 L13 L43 L94 L98 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-ene, nep-exp, nep-ind and nep-reg
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.cesifo.org/DocDL/cesifo1_wp11139.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ces:ceswps:_11139

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in CESifo Working Paper Series from CESifo Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Klaus Wohlrabe (wohlrabe@ifo.de).