Cash or Care? Insights from the German Long-Term Care System

Iris Kesternich, André Romahn, Johannes Van Biesebroeck and Marjolein Van Damme

No 11875, CESifo Working Paper Series from CESifo

Abstract: The German universal long-term care (LTC) insurance program offers beneficiaries the choice between in-kind services and a cash benefit, which can be used for anything, including informal care. The optimal level of the cash benefit depends on substitution between formal and informal care options, the cost of public funds, and distributional considerations. To evaluate various policy options, we estimate a random-coefficients demand model for the period 1999-2015 using data on the universe of LTC patients supplemented with micro moments from the German Mikrozensus. Results show strong heterogeneity in patient preferences for the three different LTC options: informal, ambulatory and stationary care. A counterfactual analysis predicts that abolishing the cash subsidy leads to a decline in patient surplus that far outweighs the savings in public expenditure. It suggests that manycountries could benefit from the introduction of a cash subsidy option for LTC.

Keywords: aging; long-term care; insurance; informal care (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: G14 I11 L1 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.ifo.de/DocDL/cesifo1_wp11875.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ces:ceswps:_11875

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in CESifo Working Paper Series from CESifo Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Klaus Wohlrabe ().