EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

An Empirically-Based Taxonomy of Dutch Manufacturing: Innovation Policy Implications

Wladimir Raymond (), Pierre Mohnen, Franz Palm and Sybrand Schim van der Loeff

No 1230, CESifo Working Paper Series from CESifo

Abstract: The paper studies the degree of homogeneity of innovative behavior in order to determine empirically an industry classification of Dutch manufacturing that can be used for policy purposes. We use a two-limit tobit model with sample selection, which explains the decisions by business enterprises to innovate and the impact these decisions have on the share of innovative sales. The model is estimated for eleven industries based on the Dutch Standard Industrial Classification (SBI 1993). A likelihood ratio test (LR) is then performed to test for equality of the parameters across industries. We find that Dutch manufacturing consists of three groups of industries in terms of innovative behavior, a high-tech group, a low-tech group and the industry of wood, where firms seem to have a rather different innovative behavior from the remaining industries. The same pattern shows up in the three Dutch Community Innovation Surveys.

Keywords: generalized tobit; high-tech industry; homogeneity; innovation policy; likelihood ratio test; model of friction; sample selection; two-limit tobit model; TPP innovator (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2004
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-ino
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (9)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.cesifo.org/DocDL/cesifo1_wp1230.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Working Paper: An Empirically-Based Taxonomy of Dutch Manufacturing: Innovation Policy Implications (2004) Downloads
Working Paper: An Empirically-Based Taxonomy of Dutch Manufacturing: Innovation Policy Implications (2004) Downloads
Working Paper: An emprically-based taxonomy of Dutch manufacturing: innovation policy implications (2004) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ces:ceswps:_1230

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in CESifo Working Paper Series from CESifo Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Klaus Wohlrabe ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-30
Handle: RePEc:ces:ceswps:_1230