Renewable Investment and Electricity Rationing: Evidence from South Africa

Mario Liebensteiner and Johannes Paha

No 12540, CESifo Working Paper Series from CESifo

Abstract: Chronic electricity shortages constrain growth and welfare in many developing countries, where load shedding rations demand. Intermittent renewables can ease shortages, but their effects depend on how infeed timing aligns with scarcity. Using high-frequency data from South Africa and an instrumental-variables strategy, we estimate the effect of wind and solar generation on electricity rationing. On average, an additional MWh of wind generation reduces load shedding by 0.28 MWh, while an additional MWh of solar generation reduces it by 0.40 MWh. Wind provides a more robust reliability contribution across the day, including the evening peak, whereas solar benefits are concentrated in daylight hours. Our estimates permit a welfare-based evaluation of renewable investment. We show that the implied reliability benefits exceed benchmark investment costs by a wide margin and are complemented by sizeable climate and local air-pollution co-benefits.

Keywords: load shedding; renewable energy; rolling blackouts; South Africa (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: L94 O13 Q41 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2026
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-reg
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.ifo.de/DocDL/cesifo1_wp12540.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ces:ceswps:_12540

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in CESifo Working Paper Series from CESifo Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Klaus Wohlrabe ().