Why is the Public Sector More Labor-Intensive? A Distortionary Tax Argument
Panu Poutvaara () and
No 1259, CESifo Working Paper Series from CESifo
A relatively high labor-intensity in government-run entities need not imply slack in their organization. Rather, it is a rational reaction to various forms of wage tax advantage that the public sector has over private firms. Even though an unequal tax treatment of public and private sectors precludes production efficiency, it may improve welfare by mitigating the labor supply distortion. With inelastic labor supply, privatizing a previously government-run sector improves welfare, while with elastic labor supply a full outsourcing of government activities can never be optimal if it goes along with a decrease in net wages.
Keywords: public sector; labor intensity; taxation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D24 H21 L33 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-mic, nep-pbe and nep-pub
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Journal Article: Why is the public sector more labor-intensive? A distortionary tax argument (2008)
Working Paper: Why is the public sector more labor-intensive? A distortionary tax argument (2008)
Working Paper: Why Is the Public Sector More Labor-Intensive? A Distortionary Tax Argument (2004)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ces:ceswps:_1259
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in CESifo Working Paper Series from CESifo Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Klaus Wohlrabe ().