Federal Research Funding and STEM Education

Emily Cook, Devaki Ghose and Ekaterina Khmelnitskaya

No 12737, CESifo Working Paper Series from CESifo

Abstract: This paper examines how federal science and engineering research funding—although intended to advance research—affects degree production and programs offered in science, technology, engineering, and mathematic (STEM). Using data from 1971–2016, the study implements a triple-difference design that exploits variation across colleges, time, and fields of study. The findings show that federal grants generate 27.4 percent of doctorates and 14.7 percent of undergraduate science, technology, engineering, and mathematics degrees, as well as 6.3 percent of doctoral programs and 3.7 percent of undergraduate programs in STEM annually across 200 U.S. research universities. The impacts are concentrated in biology and engineering, aligning with the priorities of major funders such as the Department of Health and Human Services, the National Science Foundation, and the Department of Defense. These findings suggest that research grants to universities may generate a "double dividend," simultaneously expanding the supply of skilled labor in targeted fields while also advancing scientific discovery.

Keywords: federal research funding; higher education; STEM; major choice; innovation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: H52 I23 I28 O31 O38 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2026
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.ifo.de/DocDL/cesifo1_wp12737_0.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ces:ceswps:_12737

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in CESifo Working Paper Series from CESifo Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Klaus Wohlrabe ().