Inherited Repugnance: Slavery's Legacy on Market Acceptance in Benin

Marco Fabbri, Nicola Lacetera and Plinio Limata

No 12990, CESifo Working Paper Series from CESifo

Abstract: We study support for a market-based organ procurement system among Benin residents whose family lineages descend from either enslaved people or slave-owners during the Dahomey kingdom. Descendants of enslaved families support compensating kidney donors less than descendants of slave-owners, and the gap does not extend to contested markets that do not involve the body. Differences in concerns for dignity or fairness, implicit bias, moral values, or trust do not explain these findings. The evidence points instead to an intergenerationally transmitted disposition. First, recounting slavery, descendants of enslaved families for on the body being handled and valued, and place their own ancestors inside the events, whereas slave-owner descendants narrate at a remove. Second, they report less contact with organ transplantation and transfusion, and show no reaction to personal exposure to an unmet transplant need, whereas slave-owner descendants respond sharply.

Keywords: moral limits to markets; slavery; ancient origins; culture (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D47 I11 Z13 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2026
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-afr
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.ifo.de/DocDL/cesifo1_wp12990.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ces:ceswps:_12990

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in CESifo Working Paper Series from CESifo Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Klaus Wohlrabe ().