Market Power and Information Revelation in Dynamic Trading
Piero Gottardi and
Roberto Serrano
No 1300, CESifo Working Paper Series from CESifo
Abstract:
We study a strategic model of dynamic trading where agents are asymmetrically informed over common value sources of uncertainty. There is a continuum of buyers and a finite number n of sellers. All buyers are uninformed, while at least one seller is privately informed about the true state of the world. When n = 1, full information revelation never occurs in equilibrium and the only information transmission happens in the first period. With n > 1 the outcome depends both on the structure of the sellers’ information and, even more importantly, on the intensity of competition allowed by the trading rules. When there is intense competition (absence of clienteles), information is fully and immediately revealed to the buyers in every equilibrium for n large enough, regardless of the number of informed sellers. On the other hand, for trading arrangements characterized by less intense forms of competition (presence of clienteles), for any n we always have equilibria where information is never fully revealed. Moreover, in that case, when only one seller is informed, for many parameter configurations there are no equilibria with full information revelation, even for large n.
Keywords: asymmetric information; information revelation; dynamic trading; oligopolistic competition; clienteles (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2004
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-com, nep-fin and nep-mic
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.cesifo.org/DocDL/cesifo1_wp1300.pdf (application/pdf)
Related works:
Journal Article: Market Power And Information Revelation In Dynamic Trading (2005) 
Working Paper: Market Power and Information Revelation in Dynamic Trading (2002) 
Working Paper: Market Power and Information Revelation in Dynamic Trading (2002) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ces:ceswps:_1300
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in CESifo Working Paper Series from CESifo Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Klaus Wohlrabe ().