Why "Buy American" is a Bad Idea but Politicians still Like it

Mario Larch and Wolfgang Lechthaler

No 3207, CESifo Working Paper Series from CESifo

Abstract: When the world economy was recently hit by a severe recession, governments all over the world reacted by initiating stimulus packages. Some countries (among them, most notably, China and the US) tried to put special emphasis on their home industries by including “Buy local” clauses into the stimulus package. By analyzing the dynamics of transitory changes of trade barriers as a short-run response to an economic downturn, we show that beggar-thy-neighbor policies do not work. We then come up with two rationales that help to understand why countries nevertheless consider protectionism to be a good response to a recession: (i) the lobbying of domestic, non-exporting firms, and (ii) the relationship between vulnerability, the degree of openness and loss aversion of consumers.

Keywords: protectionism; trade liberalization; short term shocks (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: F11 F12 F16 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2010
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.cesifo.org/DocDL/cesifo1_wp3207.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Why `Buy American' is a bad idea but politicians still like it (2011)
Journal Article: Why ‘Buy American’ is a bad idea but politicians still like it (2011)
Working Paper: Why buy American'' is a bad idea but politicians still like it (2009)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ces:ceswps:_3207

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in CESifo Working Paper Series from CESifo Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Klaus Wohlrabe ().