Pareto Improvement through Unilateral Matching of Public Good Contributions: The Role of Commitment

Wolfgang Buchholz (), Richard Cornes, Wolfgang Peters and Dirk Rübbelke

No 4863, CESifo Working Paper Series from CESifo

Abstract: When providing public goods through voluntary contributions, a donor may introduce unilateral matching in order to reduce underprovision of the public good and thus inefficiency. By itself, however, matching benefits the donor but harms the recipient. We apply Cornes and Hartley’s aggregative game approach to provide a novel graphical explanation of this transfer paradox, and also show how it may be avoided by introducing a commitment device.

Keywords: voluntary public good provision; matching; commitment (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: H23 H41 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2014
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.cesifo.org/DocDL/cesifo1_wp4863.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Pareto improvement through unilateral matching of public good contributions: The role of commitment (2015)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ces:ceswps:_4863

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in CESifo Working Paper Series from CESifo Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Klaus Wohlrabe ().