Risk Taking, Limited Liability and the Competition of Bank Regulators
Hans-Werner Sinn
No 603, CESifo Working Paper Series from CESifo
Abstract:
Limited liability and asymmetric information between an investment bank and its lenders provide an incentive for a bank to undercapitalise and finance overly risky business projects. To counter this market failure, national governments have imposed solvency constraints on banks. However, these constraints may not survive in systems competition, as systems competition is likely to suffer from the same type of information asymmetry which induced the private market failure and which brought in the government in the first place (Selection Principle). As national solvency regulation creates a positive international policy externality on foreign lenders of domestic banks, there will be an undersupply of such regulation. This may explain why Asian banks were undercapitalised and took excessive risks before the banking crisis emerged.
Keywords: systems competition; Basel II; banking with limited liability and Lemon bonds (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2001
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (17)
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.cesifo.org/DocDL/cesifo_wp603.pdf (application/pdf)
Related works:
Working Paper: Risktaking, Limited Liability, and the Competition of Bank Regulators (2003)
Journal Article: Risktaking, Limited Liability, and the Competition of Bank Regulators (2002) 
Working Paper: Risk Taking, Limited Liability and the Competition of Bank Regulators (2001) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ces:ceswps:_603
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in CESifo Working Paper Series from CESifo Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Klaus Wohlrabe ().