Wating Longer Before Claiming, and Activating Youth. No Point?

Bart Cockx and Eva Van Belle

No 6104, CESifo Working Paper Series from CESifo

Abstract: In Belgium school-leavers are entitled to unemployment benefits after a waiting period and eligible to intensified counselling and training in the Youth Work Plan (YWP) if a job is not found within three months. The length of the waiting period and eligibility to the YWP are sharply determined by two distinct age thresholds. These are exploited to estimate the impact of these policies on the transition rate to employment and on the quality of work. Both policies increase job finding only slightly and insignificantly. The accepted wage is unaffected, but the number of working days falls and, hence, also earnings.

Keywords: youth unemployment; policy evaluation; regression discontinuity design; survival analysis; quality of employment (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: J64 J65 J68 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.cesifo.org/DocDL/cesifo1_wp6104.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Waiting longer before claiming, and activating youth: no point? (2019)
Working Paper: Waiting Longer Before Claiming and Activating Youth. No Point? (2016)
Working Paper: Waiting Longer Before Claiming, and Activating Youth: No Point? (2016)
Working Paper: WAITING LONGER BEFORE CLAIMING AND ACTIVATING YOUTH. NO POINT? (2016)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ces:ceswps:_6104

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in CESifo Working Paper Series from CESifo Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Klaus Wohlrabe ().