Reactivity in Economic Science

Bruno Frey

No 6593, CESifo Working Paper Series from CESifo

Abstract: There is a fundamental difference between the natural and the social sciences due to reactivity. This difference remains even in the age of Artificially Intelligent Learning Machines and Big Data. Many academic economists take it as a matter of course that economics should become a natural science. Such a characterization misses an essential aspect of a social science, namely reactivity, i.e. human beings systematically respond to economic data, and in particular to interventions by economic policy, in a foreseeable way. To illustrate this finding, I use three examples from quite different fields: Happiness policy, World Heritage policy, and Science policy.

Keywords: economics; social; and natural science; reactivity; data; happiness; economic policy (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: A10 B40 C70 C80 D80 Z10 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-hap, nep-hme, nep-hpe and nep-pke
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.cesifo.org/DocDL/cesifo1_wp6593.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Working Paper: Reactivity in Economic Science (2017)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ces:ceswps:_6593

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in CESifo Working Paper Series from CESifo Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Klaus Wohlrabe ().