Moral Transgressions by Groups: What Drives Individual Voting Behavior?

Eberhard Feess (), Florian Kerzenmacher and Gerd Muehlheusser

No 8384, CESifo Working Paper Series from CESifo

Abstract: We conduct an experiment where subjects are matched in groups of three and vote on a moral transgression. Analyzing different voting rules, the frequency of votes for the moral transgression increases with the number of votes required for it. This effect persists when considering pivotal votes only, which eliminates opportunities to save on own moral costs and to rely instead on sufficiently many votes for the transgression by other group members. A series of novel treatments allows us to identify guilt sharing and preferences for consensual voting as empirically relevant and independent drivers of voting behavior.

Keywords: group decisions; unethical behaviour; experiment; voting; diffusion of responsibility; guilt sharing; donations (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C92 D02 D63 D71 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-cdm and nep-exp
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.cesifo.org/DocDL/cesifo1_wp8384.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Working Paper: Moral Transgressions by Groups: What Drives Individual Voting Behavior? (2020)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ces:ceswps:_8384

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in CESifo Working Paper Series from CESifo Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Klaus Wohlrabe ().