EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Closing Wells; Fossil Exploration and Abandonment in the Energy Transition

Inge van den Bijgaart and Mauricio Rodríguez ()

No 8453, CESifo Working Paper Series from CESifo

Abstract: Despite ambitious climate goals and already substantial stocks of developed fossil energy reserves, development of new fossil energy reserves continues to be high. This raises concerns, as it reinforces the fossil industry’s opportunities and incentives to continue extraction, and may necessitate abandonment of developed fossil reserves to meet climate targets. In this paper, we analyze the energy transition, considering fossil exploration and development activities. We provide conditions for when the fossil industry will abandon reserves, and establish that continued exploration of fossil resources is not incompatible with abandoning developed reserves. The first-best implementation of a carbon budget always involves reserve abandonment, and thus exploration that pushes developed reserves in excess of the remaining budget. A quantitative assessment reveals that a volume equal to 9-19% of current oil and gas reserves are optimally abandoned, and that, even under a 1.5oC warming target, positive exploration of new reserves is justified for another decade.

Keywords: carbon budget; energy transition; fossil exploration; non-renewable resources; renewable energy; stranded assets (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q21 Q31 Q35 Q54 Q58 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-ene and nep-env
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.cesifo.org/DocDL/cesifo1_wp8453.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Working Paper: Closing wells; fossil exploration and abandonment in the energy transition (2020) Downloads
Working Paper: Closing wells; fossil exploration and abandonment in the energy transition (2020) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ces:ceswps:_8453

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in CESifo Working Paper Series from CESifo Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Klaus Wohlrabe ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-30
Handle: RePEc:ces:ceswps:_8453