Voice at Work

Jarkko Harju, Simon Jäger and Benjamin Schoefer

No 8936, CESifo Working Paper Series from CESifo

Abstract: We estimate the effects of worker voice on job quality and separations. We leverage the 1991 introduction of worker representation on boards of Finnish firms with at least 150 employees. In contrast to exit-voice theory, our difference-in-differences design reveals no effects on voluntary job separations, and at most small positive effects on other measures of job quality (job security, health, subjective job quality, and wages). Worker voice slightly raised firm survival, productivity, and capital intensity. A 2008 introduction of shop-floor representation had similarly limited effects. Interviews and surveys indicate that worker representation facilitates information sharing rather than boosting labor’s power.

Keywords: worker representation; job separation; job quality; wages; firm survival; productivity; capital intensity (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: G30 J30 J50 J63 L22 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-hrm and nep-lab
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (5)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.cesifo.org/DocDL/cesifo1_wp8936.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Working Paper: Voice at Work (2021)
Working Paper: Voice at Work (2021)
Working Paper: Voice at Work (2021)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ces:ceswps:_8936

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in CESifo Working Paper Series from CESifo Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Klaus Wohlrabe ().