Accounting Policy and the Value Relevance of Earnings --- The Case of Revenue Recognition in the Construction Industry ---
Additional contact information
Takashi Obinata: Faculty of Economics, University of Tokyo
No CARF-J-026, CARF J-Series from Center for Advanced Research in Finance, Faculty of Economics, The University of Tokyo
It is conceived that the percentage of completion method make periodical earnings smoother than the completed contract method and that it can reflect construction activities of the firm on earnings more timely. Based on this intuition, some people believe that earnings recognized by the percentage of completion method is more value-relevant than that by the completed contract method. Though various measures of value relevance have been adopted in prior studies, this paper adopts the earnings capitalization model and investigates whether the capitalization multiple of earnings by the percentage of completion method is higher than the other. This research focuses on not only the revenue recognition method but also the ratio of revenues recognized by the percentage of completion method. By controlling the differences in firm characteristics, the difference in value relevance between revenue recognition methods is examined by means of cross-sectional comparison. The results show that the capitalization multiple for firms adopting the percentage completion method is not higher than that of the completed contract method. The capitalization multiple for subgroup of lower ratio is significantly lower than other subgroups. Those results are opposed to the common belief that adoption of percentage of completion method improves the usefulness of earnings information. Though unification into the percentage of completion method is took up for discussion in the process of conversion of international accounting standards, empirical results in this paper suggest that the grounds for the unification should be re-examined.
Pages: 57 pages
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cfi:jseres:cj026
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in CARF J-Series from Center for Advanced Research in Finance, Faculty of Economics, The University of Tokyo Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().