The Armington Assumption and the Size of Optimal Tariffs

Chunding Li (), Jing Wang and John Whalley
Additional contact information
Jing Wang: University of Western Ontario
John Whalley: University of Western Ontario

CAGE Online Working Paper Series from Competitive Advantage in the Global Economy (CAGE)

Abstract: There has been commentary on the seeming success of the world trading system responding to the large shock of the 2008 financial crisis without an outbreak of retaliatory market closing. The threat of large retaliatory tariffs and fears of a 1930s style downturn in trade have been associated with numerical trade modelling which project post retaliation optimal tariffs in excesses of 100%. In the relevant numerical modelling it is common to use the Armington assumption of product heterogeneity by country. Here we argue and show by numerical calculation that the widespread use of this assumption gives a large upward bias to optimal tariffs, both first step and post retaliation, relative to alternative homogenous good models used in trade theory.

Keywords: JEL; Classification: (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2015
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-int
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/economics/resear ... 246-2015_whalley.pdf

Related works:
Journal Article: The Armington assumption and the size of optimal tariffs (2017)
Working Paper: The Armington Assumption and the Size of Optimal Tariffs (2015)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cge:wacage:246

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in CAGE Online Working Paper Series from Competitive Advantage in the Global Economy (CAGE) Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Jane Snape ().