EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

The Armington assumption and the size of optimal tariffs

Chuantian He, Chunding Li (), Jing Wang and John Whalley

Economic Modelling, 2017, vol. 66, issue C, 214-222

Abstract: There has been commentary on the seeming success of the world trading system in responding to the large shock of the 2008 financial crisis without an outbreak of retaliatory market closing. The threat of large retaliatory tariffs and fears of a 1930s style downturn in trade have been associated with numerical trade modelling, which projects post retaliation optimal tariffs in excesses of 100%. In the relevant numerical modelling, it is common to use the Armington assumption of product heterogeneity by country. Here, we argue and show by numerical calculation that the widespread use of this assumption gives a large upward bias to optimal tariffs, both first step and post retaliation, relative to alternative homogenous good models used in trade theory. The reason is that optimal tariffs equal the inverse of the foreign export supply elasticity and are negatively related to the elasticity of the foreign offer curve. The Armington assumption model has a much more bowed foreign offer curve, which generates unrealistic larger optimal tariffs.

Keywords: F13; C63; E61; Optimal tariffs; Armington; Homogeneous goods; Numerical modelling (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (11)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264999316308847
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
Working Paper: The Armington Assumption and the Size of Optimal Tariffs (2015) Downloads
Working Paper: The Armington Assumption and the Size of Optimal Tariffs (2015) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:ecmode:v:66:y:2017:i:c:p:214-222

DOI: 10.1016/j.econmod.2017.07.003

Access Statistics for this article

Economic Modelling is currently edited by S. Hall and P. Pauly

More articles in Economic Modelling from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:eee:ecmode:v:66:y:2017:i:c:p:214-222