Measuring UK top incomes
Arun Advani,
Andy Summers and
Hannah Tarrant
Additional contact information
Andy Summers: ?London School of Economics, LSE III, CAGE and IFS.
Hannah Tarrant: LSE III
CAGE Online Working Paper Series from Competitive Advantage in the Global Economy (CAGE)
Abstract:
We compare two approaches to measuring UK top income shares—the share of income going to particular subgroups, such as the top 1%. We set out four criteria that an ideal top share series should satisfy: (i) comparability between numerator and denominator; (ii) comparability over time; (iii) international comparability; and (iv) practical sustainability. Our preferred approach meets three of these; by contrast the approach currently used to produce UK fiscal income series meets none of them. Changing to our preferred approach matters quantitatively- the share of income going to the top 1% is 2 percentage points higher, but rising more slowly, than under the alternative.
Keywords: income inequality; measurement; national accounts; top shares JEL Classification: D31; D63; E01; H2 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-isf and nep-ltv
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/economics/research/c ... tions/wp490.2021.pdf
Related works:
Working Paper: Measuring UK top incomes (2021)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cge:wacage:490
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in CAGE Online Working Paper Series from Competitive Advantage in the Global Economy (CAGE) Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Jane Snape ().