(How) Do Non-Cognitive Skills Programs Improve Adolescent School Achievement? Experimental Evidence
No 81, Working Papers from Queen Mary, University of London, School of Business and Management, Centre for Globalisation Research
Non-cognitive skills programs may be an important policy option to improve the academic outcomes of adolescents. In this paper, we evaluate experimentally the EPIS program, which is based on relatively short bi-weekly individual or small-group non-cognitive mediation meetings with students selected based on their low school achievement. Our RCT estimates, covering nearly 3,000 7th- and 8th-grade students across over 50 schools and two years, indicate that the program increases the probability of progression by 11\% to 22\%. The effects are stronger amongst older students, girls, and in language subjects, and when the program mediator is of the same gender as the student.
Keywords: Exports of services; unemployment; labour reforms (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I20 I24 J08 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-edu, nep-neu and nep-ure
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Working Paper: (How) Do Non-Cognitive Skills Programs Improve Adolescent School Achievement? Experimental Evidence (2017)
Working Paper: (How) do non-cognitive skills programs improve adolescent school achievement? Experimental evidence (2017)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cgs:wpaper:81
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Working Papers from Queen Mary, University of London, School of Business and Management, Centre for Globalisation Research Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Pedro S. Martins ().