Litigation and Settlement: New Evidence from Labor Courts in Mexico

David Kaplan, Joyce Sadka and Jorge Luis Silva-Mendez ()
Additional contact information
Jorge Luis Silva-Mendez: Stanford Law School

No 606, Working Papers from Centro de Investigacion Economica, ITAM

Abstract: Using a newly assembled data set on procedures filed in Mexican labor tribunals, we study the determinants of final awards to workers. On average, workers recover less than 30% of their claim. Our strongest result is that workers receive higher percentages of their claims in settlements than in trial judgments. We also find that cases with multiple claimants against a single firm are less likely to be settled, which partially explains why workers involved in these procedures receive lower percentages of their claims. Finally, we find evidence that a worker who exaggerates her claim is less likely to settle.

Pages: 33 pages
Date: 2006-09
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-law and nep-reg
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (6)

Downloads: (external link)
http://ftp.itam.mx/pub/academico/inves/sadka/06-06.pdf First version, 1996 (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Litigation and Settlement: New Evidence from Labor Courts in Mexico (2008)
Working Paper: Litigation and settlement: new evidence from labor courts in Mexico (2007)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cie:wpaper:0606

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from Centro de Investigacion Economica, ITAM Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Diego Dominguez ().