EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Does Competition for the Field Improve Cost Efficiency? Evidence from the London Bus Tendering Model

Miguel Amaral, Stephane Saussier () and Anne Yvrande-Billon
Additional contact information
Miguel Amaral: ATOM – U. of Paris I Sorbonne

No 2006-14, Working Papers from Center for Network Industries and Infrastructure (CNI)

Abstract: In this paper we investigate the relationship between auctions’ results and the number of bidders for local transportation contracts in London. Using an original database concerning 294 local transportation routes we find that a higher number of bidders is associated with a lower cost of service. This finding, in addition of being one of the first empirical test of a crucial and understudied theoretical issue has important policy implications, especially for countries in which bids are organized such that only few bidders are allowed to answer (e.g. France).

Keywords: public services; transportation; franchise bidding; public-private partnerships; winner’s curse; auctions (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: H0 H7 K00 L33 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 19 pages
Date: 2006-09-13
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-com, nep-law, nep-pbe and nep-ure
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.cni.tu-berlin.de/fileadmin/documents/Re ... ni_wp_no_2006-14.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Working Paper: Does Competition for the Field Improve Cost Efficiency? Evidence from the London Bus Tendering Model (2013)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cni:wpaper:2006-14

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from Center for Network Industries and Infrastructure (CNI) Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Fabian Kirsch ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).

 
Page updated 2025-03-30
Handle: RePEc:cni:wpaper:2006-14