Constant leverage and constant cost of capital: a common knowledge half-truth

Ignacio Velez-Pareja (), Rauf Ibragimov () and Joseph Tham ()

No 3939, Proyecciones Financieras y Valoración from Master Consultores

Abstract: In this teaching note we show that using the findings of Tham and Velez-Pareja 2002, for finite cash flows, Ke and hence WACC depend on the discount rate that is used to value the tax shield, TS and as expected, Ke and WACC are not constant with Kd as the discount rate for the tax shield, even if the leverage is constant. We illustrate this situation with a simple example. We analyze five methods: DCF using APV, FCF and traditional and generalformulation for WACC, present value of CFE plus debt and Capital Cash Flow, CCF. In Tham and Velez-Pareja 2002, they derive a general expression for Ke, the cost oflevered equity and for the Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC) applied to the Free Cash Flow (FCF) and Capital Cash Flow (CCF). For finite cash flows and perpetuities, the derivation presents the analysis for different levels of risk with respect to discounting thetax shields (TS). Taggart 1991 presents a revision of the set of formulations for the cost of levered Ke and WACC. He introduces the formulation with and without personal taxes and for different level of risk for discounting the TS, including the proposal by Miles and Ezzel 1980. However, Taggart does not include the case of Kd, the cost of debt as the level of risk for the TS and finite cash flows. A typical approach for valuing finite cash flows is to assume that leverage is constant (usually as target leverage) and the Ke and WACC are also assumed to be constant. For cash flows in perpetuity, and with Kd as the discount rate for the tax shield, it is indeed thecase that the Ke and WACC applied to the FCF are constant if the leverage is constant. However this does not hold true for finite cash flows. Though it might be convenient to perform calculations under such assumption, it is not in fact always true that Ke and WACC are constant under the constant leverage financing policy. As could be seen from the findings and example of Inselbag and Kaufold (1997), and as a general expression for Ke and WACC derived by Tham and Velez-Pareja (2002) shows, both the cost of levered equity and the Weighted Average Cost of Capital depend on the value of the interest taxshield (VTS), and in the case of finite cash flows valuation they could be changing from period to period if certain choice is made for the rate to discount for the expected tax shields.

Keywords: WACC; constant cost of capital; constant leverage; cash flows (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D61 G31 H43 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 17
Date: 2007-08-09
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://ssrn.com/abstract=997435

Related works:
Journal Article: CONSTANT LEVERAGE AND CONSTANT COST OF CAPITAL: A COMMON KNOWLEDGE HALF-TRUTH (2008)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:col:000463:003939

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Proyecciones Financieras y Valoración from Master Consultores
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Ignacio Velez ().