EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Occupations, Tasks and Generative AI: A Computable General Equilibrium Analysis

James Lennox and Janine Dixon

Centre of Policy Studies/IMPACT Centre Working Papers from Victoria University, Centre of Policy Studies/IMPACT Centre

Abstract: This paper develops a task-based computable general equilibrium model to analyse the long-run economic effects of generative AI (GenAI) on the Australian economy. Each occupation performs a continuum of tasks executed in three modes: with raw labour; with AI-augmented labour; or automated using equipment and AI services. Task-level productivities in AI-using modes are draws from correlated Frechet distributions, captur ing heterogeneous within-occupation exposure. The model covers 45 industries and 97 occupations, calibrated to occupation-level GenAI exposure scores. The reference simulation yields a 29.8% real GDP increase: roughly one third from task-level productivity gains, the rest from capital deepening and general equilibrium reallocation. Real consumption - our long-run welfare metric - rises by 16.2%, substantially less because additional investment is required to equip automated tasks. Augmentation accounts for more tasks than automation in nearly all industries and occupations. Labour-market adjustment is dominated by within-occupation change - extensive-margin task reallocation equivalent to two thirds of current work - rather than net employment shifts between occupations. Losses con centrate in clerical, administrative, and sales roles, while most blue-collar occupations gain. Real wage effects are weakly correlated with initial wages; the rising capital share of income may matter more for distribution. Sensitivity analysis shows aggregate outcomes hinge on the distribution of task-level productivity gains: fatter tails roughly double the GDP gain while preserving the adjustment pattern, whereas variation in the dependence parameter shifts the augmentation - automation balance and the incidence of adjustment. Conventional substitution elasticities matter less.

Keywords: Generative artificial intelligence; Computable general equilibrium; Task-based production; Occupational reallocation; Augmentation; Automation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C68 J23 J24 O33 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2026-05
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-ain
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.copsmodels.com/ftp/workpapr/g-367.pdf Initial version, 2026-05 (application/pdf)
https://www.copsmodels.com/elecpapr/g-367.htm Local abstract: may link to additional material. (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cop:wpaper:g-367

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Centre of Policy Studies/IMPACT Centre Working Papers from Victoria University, Centre of Policy Studies/IMPACT Centre Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Mark Horridge ().

 
Page updated 2026-05-19
Handle: RePEc:cop:wpaper:g-367