Are leading papers of better quality? Evidence from a natural experiment

Tom Coupé, Victor Ginsburgh and Abdul Noury ()

No 2221, LIDAM Reprints CORE from Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE)

Date: 2010-01-01
Note: In : Oxford Economic Papers, 62(1), 1-11, 2010
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (18)

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
Journal Article: Are leading papers of better quality? Evidence from a natural experiment (2010)
Working Paper: Are Leading Papers of Better Quality? Evidence from a Natural Experiment (2008)
Working Paper: Are leading papers of better quality? Evidence from a natural experiment (2008)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cor:louvrp:2221

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in LIDAM Reprints CORE from Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE) Voie du Roman Pays 34, 1348 Louvain-la-Neuve (Belgium). Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Alain GILLIS ().