Two Great Trade Collapses: The Interwar Period & Great Recession Compared
Kevin O'Rourke ()
No 12286, CEPR Discussion Papers from C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers
In this paper, I offer some preliminary comparisons between the trade collapses of the Great Depression and Great Recession. The commodity composition of the two trade collapses was quite similar, but the latter collapse was much sharper due to the spread of manufacturing across the globe during the intervening period. The increasing importance of manufacturing also meant that the trade collapse was more geographically balanced in the later episode. Protectionism was much more severe during the 1930s than after 2008, and in the UK case at least helped to skew the direction of trade away from multilateralism and towards Empire. This had dangerous political consequences.
Keywords: Great Depression; great recession; protectionism; Trade collapse (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: F13 F14 N70 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-his and nep-int
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
CEPR Discussion Papers are free to download for our researchers, subscribers and members. If you fall into one of these categories but have trouble downloading our papers, please contact us at firstname.lastname@example.org
Working Paper: Two Great Trade Collapses: The Interwar Period & Great Recession Compared (2017)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:12286
Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
http://www.cepr.org/ ... rs/dp.php?dpno=12286
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in CEPR Discussion Papers from C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers Centre for Economic Policy Research, 77 Bastwick Street, London EC1V 3PZ..
Bibliographic data for series maintained by (). This e-mail address is bad, please contact .